TABLES TO ACCOMPANY MISOGYNY SEXISM, & THE 2008 ELECTIONS—PART 2
REGIONAL COMPARISONS
|
TABLE G5-NE: THE NORTHEAST |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Margins |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
All |
Male |
Female |
gap |
|
|||||
|
CT |
Clinton |
10% |
10% |
27% |
37% |
|
|||||
|
CT |
Obama |
21% |
16% |
24% |
8% |
|
|||||
|
DE |
Clinton |
5% |
11% |
19% |
30% |
|
|||||
|
DE |
Obama |
9% |
5% |
14% |
9% |
|
|||||
|
MA |
Clinton |
18% |
10% |
25% |
15% |
|
|||||
|
MA |
Obama |
7% |
6% |
9% |
3% |
|
|||||
|
MD |
Clinton |
9% |
8% |
25% |
33% |
|
|||||
|
MD |
Obama |
13% |
3% |
23% |
20% |
|
|||||
|
ME |
Clinton |
6% |
19% |
28% |
47% |
|
|||||
|
ME |
Obama |
14% |
1% |
26% |
25% |
|
|||||
|
NH |
Clinton |
8% |
25% |
7% |
32% |
|
|||||
|
NH |
Obama |
2% |
7% |
9% |
16% |
|
|||||
|
NJ |
Clinton |
5% |
9% |
17% |
26% |
|
|||||
|
NJ |
Obama |
0% |
16% |
13% |
29% |
|
|||||
|
NY |
Clinton |
22% |
3% |
39% |
36% |
|
|||||
|
NY |
Obama |
14% |
5% |
31% |
36% |
|
|||||
|
PA |
Clinton |
1% |
16% |
16% |
32% |
|
|||||
|
PA |
Obama |
5% |
11% |
0% |
11% |
|
|||||
|
RI |
Clinton |
17% |
1% |
32% |
31% |
|
|||||
|
RI |
Obama |
15% |
4% |
24% |
20% |
|
|||||
|
VT |
Clinton |
10% |
3% |
23% |
26% |
|
|||||
|
VT |
Obama |
34% |
32% |
35% |
3% |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
All Northeast |
All |
Male |
Female |
Gap |
|||||||
|
Average |
Clinton |
8.6% |
7.9% |
23.5% |
31.4% |
||||||
|
High |
Clinton |
22% |
10% |
39% |
15% |
||||||
|
Low |
Clinton |
8% |
25% |
7% |
47% |
||||||
|
RangeSize |
Clinton |
30% |
35% |
32% |
32% |
||||||
|
Average |
Obama |
11.3% |
2.5% |
18.9% |
16.4% |
||||||
|
High |
Obama |
34% |
32% |
35% |
3% |
||||||
|
Low |
Obama |
5% |
16% |
0% |
36% |
||||||
|
RangeSize |
Obama |
39% |
48% |
35% |
33% |
||||||
|
TABLE G5-NC: NORTH CENTRAL STATES |
|||||
|
|
|
margins |
|||
|
|
|
All |
Male |
Female |
Gap |
|
IA |
Clinton |
5% |
14% |
5% |
19% |
|
IA |
Obama |
9% |
1% |
17% |
18% |
|
IL |
Clinton |
11% |
|||